SG wrote: "you still haven't produced any statistics or facts to support the things you believe"
I'm supposed to prove statements you have pretended I said, that there are no illegal hispanics in Ark City (which I never said), that illegal hispanics are good for the country (which I also never said), and how great the country will be when the U.S. is overrun (which I never said).
It won't be overrun.
It is silly: Ark City is about 5% hispanic, which is one of the lowest percentages in the U.S. (no I won't prove that. I'll leave that up to you).
The fact, although you continue to mis-state it, is I said that I'm not in support of any illegal immigration and that nobody who has written on this thread or on any other Traveler thread has supported illegal immigration. I don't need the mainstream media to support that. All you have to do is read. But each time it is stated, you claim that one person or another has said they support illegals.
If anyone gets to ask anything, I would ask that you finally admit this truth: Nobody has said they support illegal immigration and for you to quit claiming they do.
It is really telling that you categorize the news as "mainstream liberal media". Some groups might call it the "white man's mainstream media" or the "secular mainstream media", but it indicates that you don't think the rest of America and its media is trustworthy. I believe you live in a world of a "persecuted minority" although it is a minority you have chosen for yourself.
You can't trust others because they are "liberals", you can't trust the newspaper, radio news or TV because it is "liberal", and you only truly believe someone who gives you right wing crap, of which there are many sources available. The other part of a "persecuted minority" is that there is no empathy for anyone outside your group, which I've seen examples of here.
You presume that anybody that doesn't agree with you is a "liberal" including me (and you don't know me at all), and calling them a "liberal" is a pejorative term to you.
If the "news" sources are the 700 Club, or the blog that says Obama is a muslim terrorist funding an anti-zionist group, then yes, I reject the sources.
If I'm supposed to come up with facts, figures and statistics to support the words you are putting into my mouth, I won't.
SG, funny you should mention this. Just about 2 weeks ago, I noticed a van full who refused to pull over when fire trucks were coming through an intersection with their lights on. They just floored it and took off. Either they are not aware of the laws regarding such things, or they paniced and were running from the sirens. Whatever the case, they nearly caused an accident. I tried to get their tag #, but they took off too fast (way above the speed limit). Now, to be fair... I do not know whether they were US citizens or not.
By the way, why do we keep coming back to this website?
motherof2 is that a law or a courtesy? You know I have heard of some people from small towns doing things like that in big city and causing more accidents from pulling over. If someone is used to big city driving then they probably would have speed up rather than pull over. Could they are US citizens with big town driving habits. A relative of mine told me about an accident involving serveral cars (7 to 15 or more) in a big town when people from a small town where trying to pull to the side for something like what you are talking about happened. Just saying sometimes people who are just driving thru are that just driving thru and will not know how you would like them to drive, just like when you go to the bigger towns people are cursing you for your small town way of driving
SEEN IT BOTH WAYS
Of Course it's the law to move out of the way of an emergency vehicle! Where did YOU learn to drive?
SG, and DDDfan is correct according to Kansas state law, here are some sites I have found for those of you who have a hard time knowing when to yield and when not to yield to an emergency vehicle. Although it is a no brainer on what your reaction should be. Even though we are a small town here, you WILL get ticketed for non compliance if caught.
Look on page 21 on the Kansas Drivers Handbook and you will find under the heading of right of way #4, the proper response to yielding to an emergency vehicle.
Statute 8-1530: Duty of driver upon approach of authorized emergency vehicle. (a) Upon the immediate approach of an authorized emergency vehicle making use of an audible signal meeting the requirements of subsection (d) of K.S.A. 8-1738, and amendments thereto, and visual signals meeting the requirements of K.S.A. 8-1720, and amendments thereto, or of a police vehicle properly and lawfully making use of an audible signal only, the driver of every other vehicle shall do the following unless otherwise directed by a police officer: (1) Yield the right-of-way; (2) immediately drive to a position parallel to and as close as possible to the right-hand edge or curb of the roadway clear of any intersection; and (3) stop and remain in such position until the authorized emergency vehicle has passed. (b) The driver of a motor vehicle upon approaching a stationary authorized emergency vehicle, when the authorized emergency vehicle is making use of visual signals meeting the requirements of K.S.A. 8-1720, and amendments thereto, or subsection (d) of K.S.A. 8-1722, and amendments thereto, shall do either of the following: (1) If the driver of the motor vehicle is traveling on a highway that consists of at least two lanes that carry traffic in the same direction of travel as that of the driver's motor vehicle, the driver shall proceed with due caution and, if possible and with due regard to the road, weather and traffic conditions, shall change lanes into a lane that is not adjacent to that of the stationary authorized emergency vehicle; or (2) if the driver is not traveling on a highway of a type described in paragraph (1), or if the driver is traveling on a highway of that type but it is not possible to change lanes or if to do so would be unsafe, the driver shall proceed with due caution, reduce the speed of the motor vehicle and maintain a safe speed for the road, weather and traffic conditions. (c) From and after the effective date of this act and prior to July 1, 2001, a law enforcement officer shall issue a warning citation to anyone violating the provisions of subsection (b). (d) This section shall not operate to relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons using the highway. History: L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-1530; L. 2000, ch. 179, § 20; July 1.
I do like Glen Beck too! On Sunday night on Fox, Sean Hannity had a special on his show on Illegal Immigration and how much $$ it is costing America. It was very interesting and surprising.
Callus, So that you won't have to ponder the question any more, and realize that there are people on here who may have knowledge and information that you don't, or are not willing or able to locate for yourself, here it is.
Kansas Statutes Anotated, Sec. 8-1503, para (a), sub secs 1&2.
You can look it up for yourself and read it, or you can choose not to yield to and emergency veh, as described in said section, and the nice police officer will give you your own personal reference to said section. Section 8, get it?
I can't believe SG is quoting (3 times) the KKK article in support of his opinions. Apparently he agrees with it wholeheartedly. Not surprised.
None of the stuff in the KKK document is trustworthy. It is racist propaganda.
My example of this was that the document almost exactly matches the reasons given by all of the people grumbling about the hispanics in Ark City. It is very, very funny that SG thinks it is a reference to quote from. Wait till you see what they say about the Blacks, Jews, Catholics and the United Nations.
It is stupid and anybody that believes that racist stuff is stupid too.
Funny thing is, I like Lou Dobbs too. It's just sometimes he goes off on a tangent. I look at Limbaugh and Sean Hannity as important input but I constantly keep in mind just where they are coming from. It seems curious that Coulter and Limbaugh are "supporting" Clinton. I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop. They are political hacks. And only after ratings. If they can get it by riling up the masses, then they will.
I never could figure out, with the thousands of illegal narcotic Oxycontins, why Rush Limbaugh is not doing serious prison time. He kept saying black teenager drug users in big cities should go to prison, even at the time he was buying illegal drugs. But why not him? Two sets of rules. He is a hypocrite.
The best reporters are ones who call down both political sides equally.
The closest person to my political viewpoints died today.
William F. Buckley took the conservative movement and shedded the post WWII isolationists, the racial know-nothings (not that they knew nothing, but they were in a political group that called themselves "know-nothings"), the ultra pro-militaristic hawks, etc. and created an intellectual conservative movement that had intelligence, compassion and balance. Ever since Reagan eliminated the Fairness Doctrine and created hate radio (and TV), the conservative movement has suffered by being hijacked by religious and racist nuts. It's a real shame.
I watched Hannity's program, too. This was the second time I had seen it aired. You can find a link to the info at http://www.foxnews.com/hannityandcolmes/index.html . Go to the bottom and click on the videos titled "The Price We Pay". Very interesting documentation regarding the effect illegals have on crime, health care costs, gangs, drugs and identity theft.
By the way guys... Everyone claims to be on the same page regarding this issue. We all claim to be against illegal immigration and no one is claiming to hate the Mexican people. Yet, we sit here and argue until we are blue in the face. Neither side wants to believe the other. What are the real issues here? This debate has spread out over several posts and on more than one blog. From what I can tell, one side is concerned about negative feelings towards illegals are not just directed at the illegals. This side is concerned about racism and prejudice. The other side worries that those claiming to be protecting legal immigrant rights are attacking them everytime they speak out against illegals. This could easily lead one to believe that they are being "shut up".
Fact of the matter is, neither side can do much about it except contact their govenor, congressmen and senators. If they do not rule in your favor, vote them out! I am glad to see that everyone is involved in this debate and keeping themselves educated. It's just that fighting with each other when we claim to have the same "cause" seems kind of pointless. No one hates Mexicans and everyone is against illegal immigration to the U.S.! Let's all kiss and make up, then start working together towards a common goal.
I can't believe SG is quoting (3 times) the KKK article in support of his opinions. Apparently he agrees with it wholeheartedly. Not surprised.
None of the stuff in the KKK document is trustworthy. It is racist propaganda.
My example of this was that the document almost exactly matches the reasons given by all of the people grumbling about the hispanics in Ark City. It is very, very funny that SG thinks it is a reference to quote from. Wait till you see what they say about the Blacks, Jews, Catholics and the United Nations.
It is stupid and anybody that believes that racist stuff is stupid too.
Lagonda writes:"whyen did calling James a fruitcake or nut become racist??? sounds like thats the only card you can play"
Didn't know we were playing cards.
Please learn to read. I said:
"If my grandma got ahold of you she would wash out your mouth with soap. It's all just a bunch of name-calling."
Not racist. Childish name calling.
Does that clear it up any? _____________________________________________________________
I, for one can't understand calling someone first "racist", then "stupid" and getting upset about those who say "fruitcake or nut"....Are they not all the same, "NAME CALLING"? So please, when you accuse others of something, please take care of what is in your own backyard.
Now, about SG whole heartedly agreeing with the statments in that website you provided, I don't know that, and neither do you. And I don't see how you can say you do. He said that he has some of the same beliefs but that doesn't mean to me that he "wholeheartedly" believes everything that was written or will be written by these "KKK People". I personally have no problem with those who are in this country legally. The more the merrier. As SG has said many times, neither does he. However, those who insist in being here without being counted and taxed I DO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH! I don't care whether they are white, brown, black or yellow. Stand up and be counted.
To keep beating this dead horse is not productive at all. Time will tell if you have the answers. Or time will tell if he does. One thing that has come to my attention with this forum is, that we have some huge differences in this community, some may be easily over come, others not.
What I do believe is, life is changing for all of us. It isn't our parents and grandparents worlds any longer. Times have changed. When it changes your world enough, you may see things differently, or maybe not. I hope that day never comes. But if it does....we will all have to pull together not against each other or we won't survive it. We can just pretend our world isn't changing and someday wake up and find out it isn't our world after all, or we can be aware of our surroundings and talk about it, like adults. But for those who insist on being children......Just because someone doesn't want to play the same game you are, doesn't mean you can't be their friend. Just my thoughts.
You will notice lagonda, that it was YOU who brought that article into play here, and yes, the parts I took out (like I SAID BEFORE) were things that were taken from OTHER sources, such as Mexican journalists, independent studies, etc, plus, I have read these same facts before from more reliable sources. I could look them up independently if you'd prefer. I'm sure I could find many articles on laraza, reconquista, brown supremacists, etc. There is no shortage of Hispanic groups who promote the overthrow of the US to take back their land. How are brown supremasist groups any different than the klan?
"There is no shortage of Hispanic groups who promote the overthrow of the US to take back their land. How are brown supremasist groups any different than the klan?"
The "reconquista" is not a political movement. It is part of a joke (yes I mean a joke) told by hispanics, in places like San Antonio (seventh largest city in U.S., 70% hispanic) and El Paso to laugh about their newfound political influence. It is no more serious than when blacks refer to justice as "just us".
Revolutionary mexican groups trying to overthrow the U.S. government don't exist. "Brown Supremacist" groups are fictionalized inventions by the KKK to make it seem like there is an enemy out there.
You can't have fear and paranoia without someone to hate or someone who is the enemy, capable of "taking over". Once you stop making up stories about hispanics and all the damage they are doing and why to fear them, you will see that Kansas would have shrunk instead of grown without hispanics and that they contribute millions of dollars every year to the economy of Ark City.
If you want to rant and rave about illegals and have them deported, then that is fine. But it is not right to be mean or intolerant even to them and if you violate my rights or privacy or those of anyone else who is legal and minding their own business, then you are crossing the line, stepping on my toes and I will not permit that. (not exactly liberal is it?)
I am surprised about the lack of facts and unbelievable fiction running around the town. I will be around to tell people the difference between saying someone has stated a racist attitude and saying that someone is a fruitcake. I don't guess people can tell the difference, but it is up to the individuals to get a higher standard of knowledge and credibility.
Mother of 2, you are right. This is boring and unproductive.
I was just thinking the exact same thing last night.
Lagonda, and now James Jordan, have both come out and said they are against people being here illegally. Which is exactly what we have been speaking out against from the get go... so why all the arguing and name calling?
Nowhere did any of us say that we hated hispanic people, or ANY people for that matter, but I have been called a racist many times on this thread.
I give up trying to talk sense into anyone who advocates illegals being in this country, as they are obviously irrational and beyond any understanding. Thanks to thise of you who understand the real danger our country faces from this issue... I'm glad to know there are like minded people out there.
So.... It's ok to make a joke about being a racist if your black or hispanic but if you are truly concerned about illegal immigration then your just a racist?
That's funny!
I'm all for someone violating my rights or stepping on my toes to make sure I'm legal if they need to!!! Just like I don't mind extra security at the airport either!
"I love being right", you probably need some Spanish and history to follow the "reconquista" joke. It is not about racism. At the risk of sounding pedantic, here goes:
San Antonio de Bexar was originally French/Spanish/Mexican and Spanish land grants were given to Germans and U.S. citizens to develop the population and farm the land, kind of like (but different from) what was done in western Kansas and in Oklahoma in the land run (remember that one?).
Once they arrived, the Texians decided they wanted to create a Mexican state of Texas and approached Mexico City about it. Mexico City didn't like the idea and got pi##ed off and jailed Stephen Austin for 2 years which radicalized him into a revolutionary. I wonder how many revolutionaries the U.S. is making today, but that is another story.
The Mexicans took San Antonio from the Texians who re-fought and re-conquered the Mexican Army and won it back. The Mexicans re-supplied their troops and took back San Antonio in a little battle called the battle of the Alamo. But it was eventually taken back by the Texians who declared Texas a sovereign republic and it has been a sovereign country ever since (just kidding).
The word "reconquista" means "reconquering" and refers to the fact the Mexicans had it, lost it, had it again and lost it, etcetera. Each exchange of it was considered a reconquista and as the joke goes, it's not over for Texas California Arizona, and New Mexico, which were the spoils of that war.
It is not about other races making racial jokes. Sorry.
I don't think you are a citizen. I'm thinking about coming over unannounced and going through all the papers in your house and taking you downtown until someone you know can come up with your proper papers.
I'm not really interested in that and I would never do anything like that to anybody, but that is what it all means.
A lot of legal law abiding hispanic citizens have the fear that it could happen to them at any time, for no reason at all.
You sure you want that? Think real hard about that one. It's one of the things that makes us "free".
Thanks for my history lesson according to Lagonda.
You did bring up "reconquista" and said it is a joke among the hispanic people. If a white person makes a joke about slavery does that make it a joke and funny? Because it is history you know -- or maybe you can give me another history lesson?
You can't possibly begin to tell me that NONE of the hispanics in San Antonio or anywhere else aren't racists --not even one? Because it is only a "joke" and a REALLY funny one too. I guess it just isn't possible to be a racist unless you are white and legal.
I do have the "proper papers" if anyone ever deemed necessary to knock on my door -- I think most US Citizens would don't you? Believe it or not I do have friends that are hispanic and they have their "proper papers" too. AND their not scared to show them either! It is a shame that we are now being faced with making these kinds of decisions about what is fair and what is not because we are all "free." OH, and I'm not scared of the wire tapping either (gasp)-- if your not doing anything wrong -- who cares if their listening?
I'm not going to just turn my head and let it go when there is a national crisis with people illegally coming to my country and breaking the law. And making my taxes and my health care higher. It is a problem and I do have a right to be upset about it.
I don't think you are a citizen. I'm thinking about coming over unannounced and going through all the papers in your house and taking you downtown until someone you know can come up with your proper papers. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As a mother of 2 boys with Hispanic blood, this has crossed my mind. With my over active imagination, I can see many worse scenarios played out. I do not want my husband or children to be put in the middle of this fight.
Honestly, if we do not work together (I mean both sides of this argument) this thing could get very heated and out of control quickly. I would rather see the fence built and the "policing" done at the border. We have to stop illegals from coming into our country and city somehow.
As for what to do with those who are already here? Focus on those who are committing the crimes. Give the local police department the authority to do something about it when an illegal is arrested! Hopefully, the state officials will get legislation passed which will help them. Our part in this? Use your voices, or your keyboards, and get the word to them. Tell them this is needed.
Next, we have to eliminate any incentives for them to be here. Do not hire them! The ones who are here to work will not stay. They will go where the work is. We should not have to hunt the honest ones down, they will go on their own free will. If anyone has proof of someone knowingly hiring illegals, they should speak up. I would imagine no employer would want that kind of controversy (or the feds looking them up). Perhaps local "peer" pressure would, in fact, be enough to get this under control. Use your voice!
Those who are here and not working must be doing something to support themselves. I imagine this would involve some sort of illegal activity. Let's crack down on them and give them a ride back home. Again, use your voice. Communicate with local law officials when you see crimes being committed. Give them all of the information you can. They have showed us that when they catch an illegal breaking a crime they will take necessary steps with ICE. If ICE does not respond, again use your voice. Let government officials know you are watching and speaking out.
Last, we are back to the fence. We all know that if an illegal has committed a crime in our town and is deported back to their country, they are very capable of being right back here in a couple of weeks. This could be very scary for those who helped get them arrested in the first place. Secure our borders or we are just spinning our wheels and putting more Americans and Ark Citians at risk to crime.
The article does say that the terms began as a jocular term, BUT read on...
Modern usage
In more recent times, the notion of Indigenous liberation has become popularized by the Mexica Movement, a group based in Los Angeles. Whereas previous groups have advanced the notion of reclaiming only the U.S. Southwest, the Mexica Movement goes further by demanding that the entire North American continent be reclaimed by Mexicans, Central Americans, Native Americans, and Canadian First Nations.
Pretty scary stuff... not at all the JOKE that lagonda would have us believe. taking our country without firing a shot. Pretty smart if you ask me. Not that I'd fall for it, but it seems to be working on a lot of people.
They would like us to believe it is only a joke, because if the word got out, it might hamper their plans. Their plan is working so far, as you can see by the fact that we here in Kansas are having this dicussion.
"Pretty scary stuff... not at all the JOKE that lagonda would have us believe. "
I know you are pretty paranoid about the Mexicans, and it concerns me that one of your other issues is gun control.
It is really important that you stop, take a breath, and look around a bit, because the hispanics are not any greater threat to the U.S. than an army of Shriners in their mini-cars.
In fact, most organized hispanic groups are similar to the Shriners, in that they are put together for community support.
For every web page put together by a nut proclaiming Christopher Columbus was a traitor, I can find one written by another nutcase claiming "Jesus hates Mexicans" or "Hitler is part of God's Plan". Don't just think because it is on the web that it means anything.
Hispanics are not out to "get you".
If there are illegals in Ark City, which there may be some, but probably few, they are not like the conspiratorial escapee fanatics the right wing would have you believe, but probably came to Ark City to legally work in a job and got stuck, one way or another through divorce, overstaying their permit or otherwise.
You really want them to go back home? They probably do too, but may not have a way to do it. They can't get legal jobs and it costs money to get out of Kansas. Turning themselves "in" means pretty tough treatment and jail because of the rightwing nut cases who demand it and they just don't want to volunteer to play cowboys and indians. If you really want them to go back home then maybe work with a local church and set up an outreach to contact them and return them in a way that doesn't scare the living bejesus out of them. They are people too.
The concept that an illegal hispanic would be deported and come back to in two weeks presumes that hispanics have any interest in Ark City in the first place.
SG: I still want you to admit that nobody has ever stated in any of the Traveler blogs that they support or advocate illegal immigration, even though you keep claiming they do.
"Pretty scary stuff... not at all the JOKE that lagonda would have us believe. "
I know you are pretty paranoid about the Mexicans, and it concerns me that one of your other issues is gun control.
It is really important that you stop, take a breath, and look around a bit, because the hispanics are not any greater threat to the U.S. than an army of Shriners in their mini-cars.
In fact, most organized hispanic groups are similar to the Shriners, in that they are put together for community support.
For every web page put together by a nut proclaiming Christopher Columbus was a traitor, I can find one written by another nutcase claiming "Jesus hates Mexicans" or "Hitler is part of God's Plan". Don't just think because it is on the web that it means anything.
Hispanics are not out to "get you".
If there are illegals in Ark City, which there may be some, but probably few, they are not like the conspiratorial escapee fanatics the right wing would have you believe, but probably came to Ark City to legally work in a job and got stuck, one way or another through divorce, overstaying their permit or otherwise.
You really want them to go back home? They probably do too, but may not have a way to do it. They can't get legal jobs and it costs money to get out of Kansas. Turning themselves "in" means pretty tough treatment and jail because of the rightwing nut cases who demand it and they just don't want to volunteer to play cowboys and indians. If you really want them to go back home then maybe work with a local church and set up an outreach to contact them and return them in a way that doesn't scare the living bejesus out of them. They are people too.
The concept that an illegal hispanic would be deported and come back to in two weeks presumes that hispanics have any interest in Ark City in the first place.
SG: I still want you to admit that nobody has ever stated in any of the Traveler blogs that they support or advocate illegal immigration, even though you keep claiming they do.
Alejandro C. Hernandez this guy just made the front page, is he german? french? english? Chinese?,,, do you suppose that rapeing two 8 year old twins and a twelve year old are somthing Lagonda wants to happen in her city??
Well you can thank people like JJ and Lagonda and other liberal passive pigheaded widgets that we have this type of person in our city, welcoming third world culture to establish its self in your city brings third world statisitics.
I wonder if you guys can even try to make a point without name calling? What are you, like 8 years old?
I miss your point and the whole thing is typical. Were there other violent criminals on the front page today? How many others? What were their last names? Were you going to mention them or just hang all of the crime in Ark City on the guy with the spanish name? You know what they call that. They call it stupid (get it?).
I didn't realize it was now becoming illegal to have a Spanish surname in Ark City. I thought it was only illegal to be brown. I guess I'm just not keeping up with the times. You are right, we need to start deporting all the people with Spanish sounding names. I sure don't want it to be my fault again if someone with a spanish sounding name does something wrong in the future.
OOPS! Lagonda is obviously a Spanish name from Mexico, so I guess I'm out of here too, OMG!!!!!
I am not a liberal, but every time you call me one, I am going to call you a right wing hillbilly redneck idiot. Quid pro quo, amigo, and plenty of notice. (and no, I'm not going to explain it to you, other than "amigo" is obviously a racist word to fear because it is in a language nobody can understand)
I'm still waiting on the quoted Traveler blog post that shows anyone, at all, ever in support of illegal immigration. Either put up SG, or admit it.
Honestly, guys I'm going to have to agree with Lagonda on the name thing. I know of several long time citizens of Ark City with the name Hernandez. My husband has some cousins over east with that last name. Until you know that they are here illegaly, you should be careful. Many people with hispanic names live here legally, speak English and are part of our American culture. Many are leaders in our community and bring a lot to the table.
Now, having said that... This person is up on some very serious and hanus charges. It is hard not to be angered by that! We should keep our eyes on this case. Just remember, innocent until proven guilty.
Not to feed our anxieties, but I do know of a very young girl who claimed she was raped by another minor because of an alleged "gang initiation". I know I'm putting the horse before the cart, but I hope this was not the case here.
SG, I remember when we had a very interesting person on another blog. They put their .02 in and said some odd things. It was almost like they were quoting from the Reconquista Hand Book. I would not have considered this a possibility until this person began speaking out. You could not convince me that it is not on someone's mind. Probably and hopefully not the majority, but SOME do believe this is their land and they have more rights to be here than we.
I've thought about where this could go and you can call me any name you wish if we can just not discuss anything more that might involve, include or upset in any way the victims or families of any of these 3 senseless and tragic crimes.
Lagonda is right on this point, we raise in our midst enough home grown criminals that we can claim as ours. Our scociety is turning out more and more sick individuals. I for one will own up to the sick folks we produce in our soft, too tolerant, "don't spank my baby", no dicipline, culture we have made for ourselves. This is what we end up with. I will be the first to admit that we do have our own versions of sickos. But what we don't need are the illegally imported versions either. Or a concentration of them. So please don't make this a race issue...It is a criminal issue......EVERY ONE! We need to deal with our domestically grown sickos, And the imported variety. Sending the criminals home whether that is (Kansas city or Mexico city) without some kind of penalty is wrong, but of course that isn't their fault. it is our systems fault. Just because someone has never pulled a knife on someone before and tried to kidnap them doesn't mean anyone, I mean anyone should walk.,.White black or brown.....THe end result is...we just let more dangerous criminals out on the streets to come back and harm yet again someone else . Till they end up killing someone like we had last year here in our town. And NO he was not hispaninc...but his behavior was ignored by all, citizens and courts and someone paid the ultimate price. We all know who she was. We have had sexual preditors here a long time before we had a concentration of hispanics here, true. But that doesn't mean that we don't find them all, prosecute them and imprison them all. I say no deportation for those who commit violent crime against a person. Not until they serve their time for the crime. But we need to make sure our own garden variety sickos are prosecuted and imprisoned at the same time. But I say don't plead all sickos down to lesser charges and then let them walk or be deported to do it all over again to someone elses children, brother, sister, mother, daughter,or son.Make them pay! All of them regardless of color of skin or status of citizenship. I only wish it were possible to deport our home grown variety of sickos out of country but that isn't fair to the rest of the world. So we have made our bed now we must lie in it. Prosecute them, all of them, that doesn' t mean we have to provide them with color TV and airconditioning. When I was a kid I remember my parents driving by a prison work farm on our way to church. These guys were in prison and HAD to work to provide for themselves and others. Make them work, pay their own way, and prosecute prosecute prosecute.....REGARDLESS OF COLOR OF SKIN! THey don't need a free ride there either....
Do you ever wonder why I never asked "What kind of Right Wing cr@p is this blog spewing?"
There is no shortage of people who will claim that this is their country and anybody not like them has to leave. These people are called bigots. (look it up)
You don't have to go very far to find people who would say this land is mine, everyone else get out. I mean not very far at all, like maybe just a few posts back, and almost everyone who has posted on this particular blog thread. While SG may be hard pressed to come up with anyone who establishes the basis of his diatribe (and yes SG, I'm still waiting) it is easy as pie to come up with the opposite.
When I was a kid, one of my best friends was Tracy Holder, brother of Stan Holder, the Vietnam vet that was the #2 guy in the AIM, and even though we never saw him and Tracy was politically opposite from him, I got a real good close-up look at political radicalism from a very early age.
It probably is the reason I am so against name calling, racism, intolerance, bigotry and political radicalism. It is very destructive and it is all the same stuff. It doesn't matter if it is the "reconquista handbook" (which doesn't exist) , The AIM movement (there is a Ponca chapter), the racist KKK, or the far right wing or far left wing, political radicalism basically says that if you are not from within their group, you are not to be trusted and are probably trying to get away with something, lying, cheating, etc. and when they get really paranoid, then the outsider (doesn't matter who) is trying to steal their country. It is an isolated and "persecuted" minority position and is very, very stupid, because it is totally by choice.
The ironic thing is that people with the right wing attitudes are EXACTLY THE SAME as the other opposing radical groups, it is just that their "protected" groups are different. The only thing that supports it all is fear and hatred and the perception that there is another group on the "other side". It is playing "cowboys and indians" for grown-ups. About as intelligent as the goose who will peck itself to exhaustion when he sees its reflection in a glass window.
Come on guys. Grow some intelligence. The world is not out to get you.