Wondering, This is an interesting question. As you know, our legal system has a way of excusing those who seem to have a problem with controling themselves, be it in stealing, drugs, making of drugs ect..... Perfect example is Justin Thruber. How many times was he in court before he finally was arrested for allegedly being a murderer. I am not implying the man in this article is capable of the same calibur of crime, but when they piffle even what they believe to be a minor or small infractions away, are they really small? Do we know? I can tell you now, the arresting officer truely believed he had probable cause to arrest this guy, Doctor or not. Below is the state statute for creating departmental policy for law enforcement when it comes to domestic crimes. Also below is the Kansas State statute for Domestic Battery. This is what criteria the officer went by when he made the decision to arrest or not arrest.
Ann Lewis was battered many times in this county and the end result for her, was death. Did her husband do any serious jail time from those prior offenses? Granted, he is now, but Ann lost her life because of it. Is the same criteria for her many cases being used here? If so, we need to watch this case carefully. You raise some interesting questions here on those who are in the public view versus those who are just Joe Q. Citizen. Is special attention given to those with social status, or who are in the public eye, than your ordinary blue collar worker? Could it be that being a Doctor, he may risk his career by being processed or convicted as a domestic offender? I know it is, if you are in law enforcement. Is that the reason for no charges are being filed? There are many questions here that are unanswered. It doesn't sound like any of them are being answered by the County Attorneys office. Maybe we can get some answers from other readers, or research this in other places. As you can read below, it doesn't take much to be an offender, anything from a push or a shove to hitting. Criminal damage to property can even be seen as domestic violence if it is done in rage or anger between the victim and the suspect. Such as ripping a phone from the wall is a good example. Punching the wall, or throwing and breaking items. These are all domestic violence issues. This statute doesn't leave the law enforcement officer much choice on arrest or not arrest, if contact is made. Was contact made in this case????????
22-2307
Chapter 22.--CRIMINAL PROCEDURE KANSAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Article 23.--PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS 22-2307.Domestic violence calls; written policies to be adopted by law enforcement agencies; contents. (a) All law enforcement agencies in this state shall adopt written policies regarding domestic violence calls as provided in subsection (b). These policies shall be made available to all officers of such agency. (b) Such written policies shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) A statement directing that the officers shall make an arrest when they have probable cause to believe that a crime is being committed or has been committed; (2) a statement defining domestic violence; (3) a statement describing the dispatchers' responsibilities; (4) a statement describing the responding officers' responsibilities and procedures to follow when responding to a domestic violence call and the suspect is at the scene; (5) a statement regarding procedures when the suspect has left the scene of the crime; (6) procedures for both misdemeanor and felony cases; (7) procedures for law enforcement officers to follow when handling domestic violence calls involving court orders, including protection from abuse orders, restraining orders and a protective order issued by a court of any state or Indian tribe; (8) a statement that the law enforcement agency shall provide the following information to victims, in writing: (A) Availability of emergency and medical telephone numbers, if needed; (B) the law enforcement agency's report number; (C) the address and telephone number of the prosecutor's office the victim should contact to obtain information about victims' rights pursuant to K.S.A. 74-7333 and 74-7335 and amendments thereto; (D) the name and address of the crime victims' compensation board and information about possible compensation benefits; (E) advise the victim that the details of the crime may be made public; (F) advise the victim of such victims' rights under K.S.A. 74-7333 and 74-7335 and amendments thereto; and (G) advise the victim of known available resources which may assist the victim; and (9) whether an arrest is made or not, a standard offense report shall be completed on all such incidents and sent to the Kansas bureau of investigation. History: L. 1991, ch. 93, § 1; L. 1996, ch. 208, § 3; July 1.
21-3412a
Chapter 21.--CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS PART II.--PROHIBITED CONDUCT Article 34.--CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS 21-3412a.Domestic battery. (a) Domestic battery is: (1) Intentionally or recklessly causing bodily harm by a family or household member against a family or household member; or (2) intentionally causing physical contact with a family or household member by a family or household member when done in a rude, insulting or angry manner. (b) (1) Upon a first conviction of a violation of domestic battery, a person shall be guilty of a class B person misdemeanor and sentenced to not less than 48 consecutive hours nor more than six months' imprisonment and fined not less than $200, nor more than $500 or in the court's discretion the court may enter an order which requires the person enroll in and successfully complete a domestic violence prevention program. (2) If, within five years immediately preceding commission of the crime, a person is convicted of a violation of domestic battery a second time, such person shall be guilty of a class A person misdemeanor and sentenced to not less than 90 days nor more than one year's imprisonment and fined not less than $500 nor more than $1,000. The five days' imprisonment mandated by this subsection may be served in a work release program only after such person has served 48 consecutive hours' imprisonment, provided such work release program requires such person to return to confinement at the end of each day in the work release program. The person convicted must serve at least five consecutive days' imprisonment before the person is granted probation, suspension or reduction of sentence or parole or is otherwise released. As a condition of any grant of probation, suspension of sentence or parole or of any other release, the person shall be required to enter into and complete a treatment program for domestic violence prevention. (3) If, within five years immediately preceding commission of the crime, a person is convicted of a violation of domestic battery a third or subsequent time, such person shall be guilty of a person felony and sentenced to not less than 90 days nor more than one year's imprisonment and fined not less than $1,000 nor more than $2,500. The person convicted shall not be eligible for release on probation, suspension or reduction of sentence or parole until the person has served at least 90 days' imprisonment. The court shall require as a condition of parole that such person enter into and complete a treatment program for domestic violence. If the person does not enter into and complete a treatment program for domestic violence, the person shall serve not less than 180 days nor more than one year's imprisonment. The 90 days' imprisonment mandated by this subsection may be served in a work release program only after such person has served 48 consecutive hours' imprisonment, provided such work release program requires such person to return to confinement at the end of each day in the work release program. (c) As used in this section: (1) Family or household member means persons 18 years of age or older who are spouses, former spouses, parents or stepparents and children or stepchildren, and persons who are presently residing together or who have resided together in the past, and persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or who have lived together at any time. Family or household member also includes a man and woman if the woman is pregnant and the man is alleged to be the father, regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time; and (2) for the purpose of determining whether a conviction is a first, second, third or subsequent conviction in sentencing under this section: (A) "Conviction" includes being convicted of a violation of this section or entering into a diversion or deferred judgment agreement in lieu of further criminal proceedings on a complaint alleging a violation of this section; (B) "conviction" includes being convicted of a violation of a law of another state, or an ordinance of any city, or resolution of any county, which prohibits the acts that this section prohibits or entering into a diversion or deferred judgment agreement in lieu of further criminal proceedings in a case alleging a violation of such law, ordinance or resolution; (C) only convictions occurring in the immediately preceding five years including prior to the effective date of this act shall be taken into account, but the court may consider other prior convictions in determining the sentence to be imposed within the limits provided for a first, second, third or subsequent offender, whichever is applicable; and (D) it is irrelevant whether an offense occurred before or after conviction for a previous offense. (E) A person may enter into a diversion agreement in lieu of further criminal proceedings for a violation of this section or an ordinance of any city or resolution of any county which prohibits the acts that this section prohibits only twice during any three-year period. History: L. 2001, ch. 177, § 5; L. 2006, ch. 212, § 24; July 1.
21-3414
Chapter 21.--CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
PART II.--PROHIBITED CONDUCT
Article 34.--CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS
21-3414.Aggravated battery. (a) Aggravated battery is:
(1) (A) Intentionally causing great bodily harm to another person or disfigurement of another person; or
(B) intentionally causing bodily harm to another person with a deadly weapon, or in any manner whereby great bodily harm, disfigurement or death can be inflicted; or
(C) intentionally causing physical contact with another person when done in a rude, insulting or angry manner with a deadly weapon, or in any manner whereby great bodily harm, disfigurement or death can be inflicted; or
(2) (A) recklessly causing great bodily harm to another person or disfigurement of another person; or
(B) recklessly causing bodily harm to another person with a deadly weapon, or in any manner whereby great bodily harm, disfigurement or death can be inflicted.
(b) Aggravated battery as described in subsection (a)(1)(A) is a severity level 4, person felony. Aggravated battery as described in subsections (a)(1)(B) and (a)(1)(C) is a severity level 7, person felony. Aggravated battery as described in subsection (a)(2)(A) is a severity level 5, person felony. Aggravated battery as described in subsection (a)(2)(B) is a severity level 8, person felony. A person convicted of aggravated battery shall be subject to the provisions of subsection (h) of K.S.A. 21-4704 and amendments thereto.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3414; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 12; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 29; July 1.
Does anyone know for sure that there was a crime committed?? If so, and the County Attorney refused to file, then something needs to be done. If anyone has first hand knowledge, then they need to contact the Kansas Attorney General and report this abuse of power.
No charges will be filed at this time against an Arkansas City dentist arrested Oct. 21 following a domestic disturbance, Cowley County Attorney Chris Smith said.
He did not say why he was not filing charges against Dr. John D. Seitz.
"I don't discuss that on any of the cases," Smith said.
Smith said he has five years to file charges, should there be a need to reconsider. Question? If there was no crime in this case, why would he say that "should there be a need to reconsider". I agree with S23246G.
Seitz posted a $5,750 bond when he was booked into the county jail for aggravated battery and domestic battery. The money was returned to Seitz, according to a court clerk.,
Oh, come on! If you haven't noticed by now, you can get away with anything in this town. Especially if you are somebody. Like I have said before, you just about have to kill someone.
For example, I happen to know of a person being charged with the same things right now. Their case was NOT dropped Tuesday, and the State has yet to prove that there is even a case against this person. Interesting that Seitz' case was just dropped right away.
I appreciate everyones thoughts. Maybe it is time to get a new county attorney, hopefully someone will run against him this time. I just pray he doesn't screw up the Justin Thurber case. I sure would like to see the court records on domestic abuse/violence cases in Cowley County that the police have charged people with vs. the county attorneys decision. Would probably be very interesting. Would be nice if the newspapers would print those.
I'll take this one step further. I know of a couple who recently had a verbal argument in the home. The husband left to avoid conflict. This just made the wife angrier. The woman called him and left a voice message on his phone saying that she was coming to get him. There was going to be a fight and she was going to make sure he went to jail. She showed up at her husband's friends house and began hitting him. Witnesses saw this! She got in the car and left (drunk). She came back and began hitting the vehicle with her fists, feet and arms. Then she proceeded to hitting him again. Once again, there were witnesses to this. The next day, she or one of her friends called the police and had him arrested as she thought her arm was broken and her eye was black. She told police he had beat her up. Turns out her arm was not broken, but the man was arrested and is awaiting charges aggrevated battery. They told him maximum penalty could be $5,000 fine and 10 years in prison. Many witnesses saw her beating HIM and causing bodily damage to herself, however no one witnessed him hitting her. She was not arrested or charged with anything. Now, this lady is not a "somebody" in the community. In my opinion, the law is coddling her because she is a woman. The man has proof of her intentions with her own voice message. She set out to get him thrown in jail, and she got exactly what she wanted. I'm sure she sees this to her advantage in divorce and child custody court? Anyway, interesting that this person is still going through court while the dentist is not. There must be more to the story. Maybe she attacked him first, or perhaps the wife had all charges dropped and is lieing to cover for him now. I think this happens more than you think! No one knows but her. Having said all of that, I can remember back to the days when the cops "did not get involved in domestic affairs". I remember women and children being beaten with no consequences at all. I am sure this is a sticky subject and not a favorite for cops. However, we've come a long, long way.
We all recognize the fact that not just our city, but our county seems to let things slide when it comes to decipline to many who deserve it. In this case we will never know if he deserved it or not as the county attorney says, "NO" it is not going to be prosecuted. No one will know what happened exept, the victim, the officer and the county attorney. The sad thing of it is, this is not just happening in our county it is happening all over the United States. Courts being backloged with cases and many of them just being pled or like this one excused from court.
For example, in a complete different senario altogether, a suspect attacks a victim with a knife and slashes him wide open, and because the victim was too afraid to come back to testify, even with overwhelming evidence, and an admission of guilt on the suspects part, the suspect pleas to a simple battery charge, just to save time, something is seriously wrong, how can our judicial system allow this to happen? The suspect will live to slash another day, because they just didn't want to take the time to see it through. The knifeing will never be on the suspects record. This is a violent offender that is among us, and it is not on the offenders record. Sad, sad, sad....I hope they can sleep at night..........
It's a shame that the victims do not take a stand. I understand their fear, as they probably know all too well that their attackers will walk with a slap on the wrist and some fines. Honestly, would you testify against them knowing they will not be locked up? Problem is, if the court system does not do something we could start seeing a lot more "street justice". We really do not want to see people taking the law into their own hands. Also, how frustrating must it be for the good men and women on the police force? They are doing their job and bringing them in only to see them back on the streets shortly after. I hope they do not give up, as well.
Interesting enough, I was just discussing this dentist in another post. Not sure what happened on either of these issues, but from the outside it sure looks like favortism. I know one should not go around spouting off or making acusations without proof or having the whole story, though. I'm sure there is a perfectly good explanation for both issues. I should just shut up!
City eyes economic policies --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curious, a few years back I overheard a gentlement in Bryant's Hardware bragging about getting money from the city to buy the lot across from McDonald's (long before Wal-Green's purchased it) because he promised to relocate his current business and bring in more jobs. I couldn't help but notice that he did not follow through. Instead, he relocated to downtown. What happens at that point? Would a person be required to pay the city back? To me, this is an excellent example of regulations needed.
Wondering, I will try to do some research on the resources we have here in Cowley County in regard to this info. I will post what I can find for all to see. Thanks for bringing this serious issue to our attention.
Does anyone know for sure that there was a crime committed?? If so, and the County Attorney refused to file, then something needs to be done. If anyone has first hand knowledge, then they need to contact the Kansas Attorney General and report this abuse of power.
Just look up the statistics of dropped domestic violence in cowley county for the last several years and see how many cases were filed how many of them have been dropped by our D.A.and you will know that even with proof of a crime in these cases are more often than not dimissed.
You would think that they think they are protecting family but really they are taking them down a notch by showing them your place or station in life can determine how the law will be applied. Or maybe they are just ensuring inmates for weekend stays at the new jail. After all we still paid for the time they locked up rather it be 24hrs or 72hrs and then get out and get your money back on top of that !!! It's a good thing the Legal Lady is Blind
Does anyone know for sure that there was a crime committed?? If so, and the County Attorney refused to file, then something needs to be done. If anyone has first hand knowledge, then they need to contact the Kansas Attorney General and report this abuse of power.
Just look up the statistics of dropped domestic violence in cowley county for the last several years and see how many cases were filed how many of them have been dropped by our D.A.and you will know that even with proof of a crime in these cases are more often than not dimissed.
You would think that they think they are protecting family but really they are taking them down a notch by showing them your place or station in life can determine how the law will be applied. Or maybe they are just ensuring inmates for weekend stays at the new jail. After all we still paid for the time they locked up rather it be 24hrs or 72hrs and then get out and get your money back on top of that !!! It's a good thing the Legal Lady is Blind
Where do you go to look up those statistics?
I do know that in the past, it was the policy of the ACPD to file a domestic case, even if the husband and wife were only yelling at one another in the privacy of their home, and had been overheard by a neighbor, etc. When it was brought up that the couple were not actually violating any domestic violence laws, since neither had done anything physical, the higher ups at the department said that it was standard procedure to file them all, but that the city attorney would usually drop all charges. It seemed a complete waste of time to even file the cases, only to be dropped, but I guess they felt it showed productivity on the part of the department.
As someone pointed out, the law is very strict when it comes to domestic violence. It is one of the few instances where an officer has ZERO discretion as to whether or not to make an arrest. What I find compelling about this case is that the initial charge by the officer was AGGRAVATED BATTERY, which means that either some kind of weapon was involved, or great bodily injury was dealt. Either way, it sounds like something that should be charged if the officers and the County Attorney both did their jobs right.
Wondering, I will try to do some research on the resources we have here in Cowley County in regard to this info. I will post what I can find for all to see. Thanks for bringing this serious issue to our attention.
Just to let you know and cut down on some of your time and running around, there is a report that most local law enforcement agencies use for keeping track of all citations,tickets and officers who write them by sex,race, and national origin such things as this is a matter of public record, that should give you some idea of how many charges or call outs our made per year and per month. These are public records and then if a case is closed on any domestic case I think it also become pulic record that is available to whom ever may be interested !!!
After several evenings of research on the internet I have not found any sites that directly give any stats on Cowley county alone. I did however find on the county website, due to the freedom of information act, you can request for a fee, information in regard to that type criminal information. I would think that Safe Homes of Cowley county would at least try to get the information (stats) out there to the public and educate the area on domestic violence in this county. I would think that seeing information online, or posted in public places could be a good way to reach those who are being battered, rather than wait till they have to file a report and risk injury. I realize we recently had a program at Browns Center,on domestic violence, but do those who need help get tickets and really go to these programs? Granted someone who may be able to identify symptoms of abuse in others may see this and it would be a good learning tool for those who don't know what the signs are, but for those who really need help, it often comes too late, or never. To quote a well known higher level, law enforcement officer in this county, "you can make the numbers say anything you want them too". So maybe stats are not a reliable source after all. It would be interesting to know just how many cases are pled or dismissed in Cowley County.......
Wondering, I will try to do some research on the resources we have here in Cowley County in regard to this info. I will post what I can find for all to see. Thanks for bringing this serious issue to our attention.
Just to let you know and cut down on some of your time and running around, there is a report that most local law enforcement agencies use for keeping track of all citations,tickets and officers who write them by sex,race, and national origin such things as this is a matter of public record, that should give you some idea of how many charges or call outs our made per year and per month. These are public records and then if a case is closed on any domestic case I think it also become pulic record that is available to whom ever may be interested !!!
JUST IN CASE YOU REALLY WANT TO KNOW
Why yes, CALLUS, I would love to know where you are getting this information on this "report". I have checked on the County web site and found nothing in regard to the stats. I also checked on several State websites and only found information on the KBI website, however, the information I found there was not comeplete. I did find the stats for 2005 on the KBI website was complete but the 2006 showed incomplete on Arkansas City and Winfield Departments. Cowley County S.O. had their information online there. Can you tell me where this "report" is your speaking of? I am however, not paying the county money to obtain these records from the county.
With the freedom of information.....Yes, the KSOR (Kansas Offense Report) is public record, page one, if I am not mistaken. But that has very little info on it in regard to the case other than the charges, name of victim, name of suspect. This won't have whether there was a conviction or plea on it. As far getting information on how many calls are made and what kind of calls, or how many per month or week, as far as I know only the departments have this information.
Don't worry about the "running around", I have done very little of that. The research I have done has been totally online. If you have anything "detailed" to offer as far as where to go to get this information besides where I have already looked, I would love to know. Thank you for your input.
After several evenings of research on the internet I have not found any sites that directly give any stats on Cowley county alone. I did however find on the county website, due to the freedom of information act, you can request for a fee, information in regard to that type criminal information. I would think that Safe Homes of Cowley county would at least try to get the information (stats) out there to the public and educate the area on domestic violence in this county. I would think that seeing information online, or posted in public places could be a good way to reach those who are being battered, rather than wait till they have to file a report and risk injury. I realize we recently had a program at Browns Center,on domestic violence, but do those who need help get tickets and really go to these programs? Granted someone who may be able to identify symptoms of abuse in others may see this and it would be a good learning tool for those who don't know what the signs are, but for those who really need help, it often comes too late, or never. To quote a well known higher level, law enforcement officer in this county, "you can make the numbers say anything you want them too". So maybe stats are not a reliable source after all. It would be interesting to know just how many cases are pled or dismissed in Cowley County.......
The reason for the domestic violence information at cowley was to help other people that may be around it to understand it and try to prevent it if they can. The problem here is that the information you want people do not ant to share it with you because of some of the names you may come across or you may call foul play about something. This happens a lot and in some cases people have been forced to have a legal council request this for them or some other information party assit them. But the truth is any one should be able to walk into the court house or city hall and get the information you seek, simply because it is public information , wheather it is used against them or not. I think more people should look into these kind of matters more often to keep people more in line with there public duties, rather self motivated duties.
I found this in the Courier this weekend. Sounds like someone is getting money to further the battle against Domestic Violence. I can see the need for training in the sexual assualt cases as the evidence must be handled perfectly to make a case but in the Domestic Violence area it sounds like they just need to prosecute the suspects. ALL of them not just the ones they pick and choose. Reading below the CA interjects his thoughts. He must be talking about the sexual assault vicims...............
Area group gets $182,972 to fight domestic violence
By JEANNE RICHARDSON Reporter
A Department of Justice grant for $182,972 has been awarded to a group formed recently to assist victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
The group, the Southern Kansas Rural Violence Against Women Cooperative (SKRVAWC) is a coalition of agencies partnering their services in order to better help domestic violence victims.
The grant, written and applied for in May by Shona Salzman, director of William Newton Healthcare Foundation, and Mari Cochran, former grant writer for Safe Homes Inc., was awarded in September.
One of the requirements for the grant application was to establish a partnership with other entities in the community. The grant has been the catalyst for the team work that Salzman hopes to see come out of the organization.
The monies from the grant will provide much needed funds for forensic nurse's training. "By the end of the grant cycle," said Salzman, "William Newton Hospital will have six certified forensic nurse examiners on staff." These nurses will be crucial in the initial abuse examinations for domestic abuse cases, Salzman said.
The other SKRVAWC partners include Cowley County Safe Homes, the county attorney's office, the sheriff's department and the Arkansas City and Winfield police departments. The coalition's goals are to increase awareness and availability of services for sexual assault, domestic violence and child abuse in the entire rural southern Kansas service area (Cowley Chautauqua, Elk and southern Sumner counties); and to train victim advocates to increase services for victims and to prosecute offenders.
"The two-year grant provides funds to develop a coordinated team approach focused on decreasing the number of victims and increasing the number of offenders successfully prosecuted," said county attorney Chris Smith.
The coalition is still growing as providers learn more about their potential. The focus remains on assisting victims of domestic violence in as many ways as possible, Salzman said.
Wondering, I will try to do some research on the resources we have here in Cowley County in regard to this info. I will post what I can find for all to see. Thanks for bringing this serious issue to our attention.
Just to let you know and cut down on some of your time and running around, there is a report that most local law enforcement agencies use for keeping track of all citations,tickets and officers who write them by sex,race, and national origin such things as this is a matter of public record, that should give you some idea of how many charges or call outs our made per year and per month. These are public records and then if a case is closed on any domestic case I think it also become pulic record that is available to whom ever may be interested !!!
JUST IN CASE YOU REALLY WANT TO KNOW
Why yes, CALLUS, I would love to know where you are getting this information on this "report". I have checked on the County web site and found nothing in regard to the stats. I also checked on several State websites and only found information on the KBI website, however, the information I found there was not comeplete. I did find the stats for 2005 on the KBI website was complete but the 2006 showed incomplete on Arkansas City and Winfield Departments. Cowley County S.O. had their information online there. Can you tell me where this "report" is your speaking of? I am however, not paying the county money to obtain these records from the county.
With the freedom of information.....Yes, the KSOR (Kansas Offense Report) is public record, page one, if I am not mistaken. But that has very little info on it in regard to the case other than the charges, name of victim, name of suspect. This won't have whether there was a conviction or plea on it. As far getting information on how many calls are made and what kind of calls, or how many per month or week, as far as I know only the departments have this information.
Don't worry about the "running around", I have done very little of that. The research I have done has been totally online. If you have anything "detailed" to offer as far as where to go to get this information besides where I have already looked, I would love to know. Thank you for your input.
You should be able to call your local chief of police and he should be able to print out just about as much informatoin as you want. I think he can even look up by catogory for you, it is part of there means of crime prevention and there suggested number of traffic stops per month to prevent crimes.
I'm curious... is there anyone on here who goes to Seitz for dentistry, and if so, has this incident made you think about changing dentists? Or has anyone who has read the accounts made the decision that they will not go to Seitz? Just wondering what kind of impact his arrest will have, even though he managed to skate away scott free.
Callus, this will only give me the amount of calls per month and not detailed what the calls were. As far as knowing whether these were charged, convicted, pled or dismissed we won't know from the info you get from the PD. Sometimes when a call comes in, it may be just a verbal, but it will get grouped with the other domestic calls and it makes it hard to break it down to know just how much violence, if any, took place. It could be grouped with those calls of parents having a hard time controling their children. ( And yes there are those calls). Getting with the PD would be a good idea if they have it broken down in more detailed sections. Which for the public I am sure they do not. I was looking for the state stats on each county of our size to compare them too ours. But from the site I found AC and Winfield catagories were incomplete if the info isn't there I can't compare it. I am not sure if that means they haven't turned in the info for that year and therfore, it can't be completed or not. Thanks anyway!
Callus, this will only give me the amount of calls per month and not detailed what the calls were. As far as knowing whether these were charged, convicted, pled or dismissed we won't know from the info you get from the PD. Sometimes when a call comes in, it may be just a verbal, but it will get grouped with the other domestic calls and it makes it hard to break it down to know just how much violence, if any, took place. It could be grouped with those calls of parents having a hard time controling their children. ( And yes there are those calls). Getting with the PD would be a good idea if they have it broken down in more detailed sections. Which for the public I am sure they do not. I was looking for the state stats on each county of our size to compare them too ours. But from the site I found AC and Winfield catagories were incomplete if the info isn't there I can't compare it. I am not sure if that means they haven't turned in the info for that year and therfore, it can't be completed or not. Thanks anyway!
I once had a police cheif tell me and later show me form statistic
required to be keep in his departmewnt just how many D.V. cases or citations given and also how many the D.A. had dropped for two years during his watch. Most if not all departments use a lot state and federal grant money based off of statistic kept by the department that targets specific money for problems such as domestic violence preventive training or drug problems in the community. For this to happen all information gathered must be broke down by cases filed to the D.A. by the department. Just remember this that even local government is required to keep track of most everything they do. And most of the time to keep the grant money they must from time to time make a report of the results from the training and actions thereafter.
So you get arrested for domestic violence/abuse and then our County Attorney drops it and then he gives you your bond money back. This person gets off free. What about the next person? Was it because he was a "well known citizen"? What about the former school board memeber that was arrested for public intoxication, disorderly conduct and domestic violence? Did he get away with it too? Sure would like to know. Maybe instead of giving that money back to that person , they should have to donate it to Safe Homes!
No charges will be filed at this time against an Arkansas City dentist arrested Oct. 21 following a domestic disturbance, Cowley County Attorney Chris Smith said.
He did not say why he was not filing charges against Dr. John D. Seitz.
"I don't discuss that on any of the cases," Smith said.
Smith said he has five years to file charges, should there be a need to reconsider.
Seitz posted a $5,750 bond when he was booked into the county jail for aggravated battery and domestic battery. The money was returned to Seitz, according to a court clerk.,
Callus wrote:I once had a police cheif tell me and later show me form statistic
required to be keep in his departmewnt just how many D.V. cases or citations given and also how many the D.A. had dropped for two years during his watch. Most if not all departments use a lot state and federal grant money based off of statistic kept by the department that targets specific money for problems such as domestic violence preventive training or drug problems in the community. For this to happen all information gathered must be broke down by cases filed to the D.A. by the department. Just remember this that even local government is required to keep track of most everything they do. And most of the time to keep the grant money they must from time to time make a report of the results from the training and actions thereafter. ******************************************************************************* Callus--- I once had a undersheriff tell me that you can make numbers say anything you want. So I am not really too trusting of the stats that a PD or a SO can show on paper. I was taken back by those words he spoke to me that day.Truely disappointed, but shockingly educated on how things work. I figured by that he could make the stats say anything he wanted to get/keep the grants. Yes, I am sure it does look nice to have the domestic violence appear that it is going down on this paticular Chief's watch. But from what I have heard straight from one of the horses.....mouth, numbers cannot always be trusted. Sorry if I seem a little jaded on the criteria put out by some departments.Thank you for all of your input. The bottom line is we still have a problem with these issues being dismissed in court by a county attorney with a history of being lax on some cases, be it DV, or any other charge.
Callus wrote:I once had a police cheif tell me and later show me form statistic
required to be keep in his departmewnt just how many D.V. cases or citations given and also how many the D.A. had dropped for two years during his watch. Most if not all departments use a lot state and federal grant money based off of statistic kept by the department that targets specific money for problems such as domestic violence preventive training or drug problems in the community. For this to happen all information gathered must be broke down by cases filed to the D.A. by the department. Just remember this that even local government is required to keep track of most everything they do. And most of the time to keep the grant money they must from time to time make a report of the results from the training and actions thereafter. ******************************************************************************* Callus--- I once had a undersheriff tell me that you can make numbers say anything you want. So I am not really too trusting of the stats that a PD or a SO can show on paper. I was taken back by those words he spoke to me that day.Truely disappointed, but shockingly educated on how things work. I figured by that he could make the stats say anything he wanted to get/keep the grants. Yes, I am sure it does look nice to have the domestic violence appear that it is going down on this paticular Chief's watch. But from what I have heard straight from one of the horses.....mouth, numbers cannot always be trusted. Sorry if I seem a little jaded on the criteria put out by some departments.Thank you for all of your input. The bottom line is we still have a problem with these issues being dismissed in court by a county attorney with a history of being lax on some cases, be it DV, or any other charge.
Elee, you are write, but would you have a little confidence in a chief, who claims to be a moral upriight man and a person who say's to the community he will stand for justice and make your community something to be proud of, to give you the true facts of what is happening on his watch. I know it would be hard to think that there is a straight shooter () of facts to his local community, but this one says he is and will be. A person who will not leave his value at home and lead the dept. with his outstanding example of how to do the right thing for building trust in his community. I hope that even if you ever had to take it harshly and undue from someone in that type of position of authority or know someone who has , that you would still look the other way and believe that person this time or give one the benefit of the doubt about the truth of public information. I guess what know matter what you here you are suppose to always believe the CHIEF of POLICE and his merry bandits. I know I can (LOL). No really laugh out loud if you think that the D.A. and the Cheif will not give you the truth. I know how you feel but the humor of htis should help you feel a little better. I will continue to try to gather some infomation for you soon!!!
I quit using him about 13 years ago! I had a dry socket which sent me back to his office on 3 occasions. The first two times, he did not look at my tooth, just wrote me a script for Percocets. The third time, I demand that he fix my tooth and he squirted some Iodine in it and what do you know, it was better in 5 minutes. I didn't want the medicine, I just wanted the pain to go away. Not sure what he was doing here, but it seemed wrong to me. Also, had the pleasure of being in Long John Silvers one evening and heard him yelling at the top of his lungs at his wife. He was really humiliating her like she was a dog! This was about 17 years ago. The two incidents were enough for me. I found another dentist. However, I am sure he will lose many more patients over his latest publicity. Justice will be served one way or another.
Alas where are the days in America when you were innocent until proven guilty? It seems that so many here are willing to "lynch" the local dentist for having his name in the paper without knowing the facts. Now of course I do not know the facts but this is what I do know.
The staute requires each law enforcement agency to have a policy that, amoung other things, defines domestic violence. Now put yourselves in the place of the law enforcement agency attempting to enforce the laws in the most letigious society in the world to date. I can guarantee that most of you would write a very broad policy and enforce it vigorously to avoid being sued in case someone were to end up like Ann Lewis.
We can not, and should not, expect law enforcement officers to be able to adequately asses all aspects of every situation during a small snapshot in time. If that were the case we would not need county attorneys only Judges and Juries, roles which all on this post are trying to fill.
The legal process has its checks and balances. The police deal with the information they have at the moment and act accordingly. Then the county/city attorneys who have the luxory of time and analysis of the entire situation make a decision as to whether charges are warranted. Sometimes the facts say yes and sometimes the facts just don't support the charge and none are filed. Rightfully so. In other cases, a small minority, the facts do support charges but the prosecutor can not file because of errors made by the police during the arrest. Are we to crucify the prosecutor in those cases as well.
Let's all wake up and take a minute to think beyond the headlines and perhaps reserve the decisions for those that have adequate information and insite to make them.
Motherof2 wrote: I quit using him about 13 years ago! I had a dry socket which sent me back to his office on 3 occasions. The first two times, he did not look at my tooth, just wrote me a script for Percocets. The third time, I demand that he fix my tooth and he squirted some Iodine in it and what do you know, it was better in 5 minutes. I didn't want the medicine, I just wanted the pain to go away. Not sure what he was doing here, but it seemed wrong to me. Also, had the pleasure of being in Long John Silvers one evening and heard him yelling at the top of his lungs at his wife. He was really humiliating her like she was a dog! This was about 17 years ago. The two incidents were enough for me. I found another dentist. However, I am sure he will lose many more patients over his latest publicity. Justice will be served one way or another.
I do believe you when you say you saw what you saw in Long John's that day, I believe you have been very honest with the posts you have posted in the past. I saw no indication you have not been honest. Definantly a red flag there. *************************************************** Dowereallythink:Alas where are the days in America when you were innocent until proven guilty? It seems that so many here are willing to "lynch" the local dentist for having his name in the paper without knowing the facts. Now of course I do not know the facts but this is what I do know.
Really none of us do, but I find if the Police department saw fit to arrest him and blast this guys name in the paper they had something to go on I would think. What I do know, if the officer didn't see something that made him believe the victim was abused there wouldn't have been an arrest. From the statement above there has been more than one occaision he had a hard time keeping his temper to a minimum. So it makes the call believable. For someone in the public eye it is important to be as politcally correct as possible. If not, that is the risk you take with your career.
The staute requires each law enforcement agency to have a policy that, amoung other things, defines domestic violence. Now put yourselves in the place of the law enforcement agency attempting to enforce the laws in the most letigious society in the world to date. I can guarantee that most of you would write a very broad policy and enforce it vigorously to avoid being sued in case someone were to end up like Ann Lewis.
We can not, and should not, expect law enforcement officers to be able to adequately asses all aspects of every situation during a small snapshot in time. If that were the case we would not need county attorneys only Judges and Juries, roles which all on this post are trying to fill.
Some may be trying to judge, but not all. Some are assessing the charge by looking at the statutes to see what the officers had to gauge their decisions by. And showing our concern for not only this case but many that have been pled, dismissed in the past.....We all know that there have been some serious offenses that have taken place in our community in the past few years and many have occured when those suspects who have history are not prosectuted or just dealt with lightly. We only know what we witness, read in the paper, or hear on the street.
The legal process has its checks and balances. The police deal with the information they have at the moment and act accordingly. Then the county/city attorneys who have the luxory of time and analysis of the entire situation make a decision as to whether charges are warranted. Sometimes the facts say yes and sometimes the facts just don't support the charge and none are filed. Rightfully so. In other cases, a small minority, the facts do support charges but the prosecutor can not file because of errors made by the police during the arrest. Are we to crucify the prosecutor in those cases as well.
When a mistake is made by police during these kinds of calls, it is a serious problem. Calls like those can be life or death, if not this time, maybe the next. Or if a mistake was made, maybe it was publishing it before the facts were all out on the table. Sometimes it is more important for departments to look good to the public... that they take chances on putting ALL arrests in the paper. Probably NOT a good policy. For this very reason. Was he an offender? maybe... Will we ever know for sure? probably not.....If he was, will he offend again? more than likely. I guess if that is the case, it is a matter of time. If there was an offense, hopefully the victim and the suspect will seek assistance. That is all we can hope for.
Let's all wake up and take a minute to think beyond the headlines and perhaps reserve the decisions for those that have adequate information and insite to make them.
It is important for us to trust our judicial leaders somewhat, but to be led blindly is not the perfect condition. I don't see a problem with asking questions when you have them. Especialy if issues are going to be published in a community paper/internet.
You know, I have listened to many people complain about "conspiracy theories" concerning our local government over the years. I have always dismissed them, thinking that people are overly paranoid or just have nothing better to do than dream this kind of stuff up. I prefer to believe that everyone's hearts are in the right place. However, there is one fact which concerns me... The other domestic violence case I spoke about earlier is about to be dismissed for a rather large fee. Part of the money is to go to the attourney and the other to the Cowley Safe Home. Now, granted the person should have and probably would have gotten the case dismissed if it went to a jury trial as he was attacked by the wife and was only defending himself. I would like to also note that the husband and wife have since reconciled. However, I do not understand why "buying" your way out of the legal system is even an option. I have seen this too many times! Then it hit me... Am I wrong to point out that a certain judge and lawyer are brothers? Everyone has always told me that if you want to get out of trouble, you have to use this attourney and be prepared to pay a premium for the services. Perhaps this lawyer is just darn good at his job, or perhaps the "conspiracy theory" was not so far fetched? Probably not, but it would be a good "racket" and I can see why there are paranoid people in this town. I am not an expert on the court system by any means and really do not know if these particular cases would be seen by local judges or on a county level. Heck, I do not even know what level of law this certain judge rules on! Honestly, I do not think anyone like a dentist gets off due to "who they are". I DO believe, though, that anyone can get out of trouble in Ark City for the right amount of $$$. Whether he is innocent or guilty, I'm sure the dentist could arrange to make this happen (judging by what he drives). Everyone tells me that our jails are full and the judges can not throw everyone in jail, but tell me this... Are the jails full of those who could not afford to "buy" their way out? Please tell me I am wrong! Someone please tell me that the local government really does have it's citizens best interest in mind and rules on each case accordingly. If I was ever tried for a crime I did not commit, I could not afford to buy my way out. What would be my fate?
There are claims in almost every small town, and big cities for that matter, that with dollars you can get out of trouble. I am sure that it is true to some extent but not overwhelmingly so. What ever happened to the former school board member that was charged? i have heard that he doesn't have much money so what happened to him?
You know, I have listened to many people complain about "conspiracy theories" concerning our local government over the years. I have always dismissed them, thinking that people are overly paranoid or just have nothing better to do than dream this kind of stuff up. I prefer to believe that everyone's hearts are in the right place. However, there is one fact which concerns me... The other domestic violence case I spoke about earlier is about to be dismissed for a rather large fee. Part of the money is to go to the attourney and the other to the Cowley Safe Home. Now, granted the person should have and probably would have gotten the case dismissed if it went to a jury trial as he was attacked by the wife and was only defending himself. I would like to also note that the husband and wife have since reconciled. However, I do not understand why "buying" your way out of the legal system is even an option. I have seen this too many times! Then it hit me... Am I wrong to point out that a certain judge and lawyer are brothers? Everyone has always told me that if you want to get out of trouble, you have to use this attourney and be prepared to pay a premium for the services. Perhaps this lawyer is just darn good at his job, or perhaps the "conspiracy theory" was not so far fetched? Probably not, but it would be a good "racket" and I can see why there are paranoid people in this town. I am not an expert on the court system by any means and really do not know if these particular cases would be seen by local judges or on a county level. Heck, I do not even know what level of law this certain judge rules on! Honestly, I do not think anyone like a dentist gets off due to "who they are". I DO believe, though, that anyone can get out of trouble in Ark City for the right amount of $$$. Whether he is innocent or guilty, I'm sure the dentist could arrange to make this happen (judging by what he drives). Everyone tells me that our jails are full and the judges can not throw everyone in jail, but tell me this... Are the jails full of those who could not afford to "buy" their way out? Please tell me I am wrong! Someone please tell me that the local government really does have it's citizens best interest in mind and rules on each case accordingly. If I was ever tried for a crime I did not commit, I could not afford to buy my way out. What would be my fate?
You have got to be joking... the justice system in this country is designed to treat everyone, regardless of race, creed, religion, or social status, the same. Money has nothing to do with anything... if a person is guilty, he is found guilty, and if he's innocent, he is found innocent, regardless of money...